Rajasthan Royals Manager Faces Scrutiny Over Phone Use During IPL Match
News

Rajasthan Royals Manager Faces Scrutiny Over Phone Use During IPL Match

Apr 23, 2026 By Rajeshware 3 min read 192 views

Rajasthan Royals Manager Faces Scrutiny Over Phone Use During IPL Match

Published: 5 September 2026 | Author: Romi Bhinder

{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@type”: “NewsArticle”,
“headline”: “Rajasthan Royals Manager Faces Scrutiny Over Phone Use During IPL Match”,
“image”: [
“”
],
“datePublished”: “2026-09-05T09:00:00+05:30”,
“dateModified”: “2026-09-05T09:00:00+05:30”,
“author”: {
“@type”: “Person”,
“name”: “Romi Bhinder”
},
“publisher”: {
“@type”: “Organization”,
“name”: “Example Sports News”,
“logo”: {
“@type”: “ImageObject”,
“url”: “”,
“width”: 200,
“height”: 60
}
},
“mainEntityOfPage”: {
“@type”: “WebPage”,
“@id”: “”
},
“keywords”: “Rajasthan Royals, IPL, phone use, anti‑corruption code, BCCI, dugout policy”
}

Key Takeaways

  • Rajasthan Royals manager Romi Bhinder was filmed using a smartphone in the dugout on 13 May 2024.
  • The BCCI issued a showcause notice under Article 12.4 of the IPL anti‑corruption code.
  • Potential penalties include fines up to ₹5 crore and multi‑match suspensions.
  • Stakeholders are calling for uniform, stricter dugout‑device policies across all IPL franchises.
  • Proposed reforms include device‑free zones, real‑time monitoring, and clearer disciplinary guidelines.

Background of the Incident

During the high‑stakes clash between the Rajasthan Royals and the Mumbai Indians at the Wankhede Stadium on 13 May 2024, a freelance photographer captured a startling moment: manager Romi Bhinder holding a smartphone inside the dugout while the match was in progress. The photographer’s image quickly spread across social media platforms, sparking a debate about the integrity of the IPL’s anti‑corruption framework and the permissible use of electronic devices by team officials.

According to the IPL’s anti‑corruption code, any communication device used within the team’s designated areas must be pre‑approved and logged. The code is designed to prevent the leakage of sensitive match‑related information to betting syndicates. While players have been regularly reminded of these rules, officials — particularly managers and coaches — have historically operated under a more ambiguous set of guidelines.

The photograph showed Bhinder holding his phone with the screen visibly illuminated, suggesting active usage rather than a quick glance. BCCI officials, upon reviewing the footage, concluded that the breach warranted a formal inquiry under Article 12.4, which specifically addresses “unauthorized communication and device usage in restricted zones.”

BCCI’s Immediate Response

Within 48 hours of the incident, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) issued a showcause notice to the Rajasthan Royals franchise. The notice demanded a detailed written explanation from Bhinder, the franchise, and the team’s senior management regarding: (a) the purpose of the phone use, (b) any communications made during the match, and (c) the steps the franchise intends to take to prevent a recurrence.

The BCCI also reminded all participating teams that the anti‑corruption code is “living legislation,” meaning that penalties can be escalated if the governing body deems the breach severe enough. Potential sanctions, as outlined in the code, include:

  1. Fines ranging from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore, depending on the nature of the violation.
  2. A suspension period of one to three matches for the individual official.
  3. In extreme cases, a permanent ban from holding any official capacity in BCCI‑sanctioned events.

Stakeholder Reactions

Reactions poured in from across the cricketing ecosystem. Former players, commentators, and even rival franchise owners weighed in on social media and in press briefings. The consensus was clear: while the incident may appear minor on the surface, it highlights a systemic inconsistency in how the anti‑corruption code is enforced among players versus officials.

Former Indian cricketer and now commentator Sunil Gavaskar stated, “If a player is caught with a phone and faces immediate suspension, the same cannot be said for a manager. The BCCI must ensure parity.” Similarly, the IPL’s Players’ Association released a statement urging the governing body to “standardize device‑free zones and introduce real‑time monitoring technology for all team personnel, not just players.”

Comparative Analysis: Past Breaches and Their Outcomes

To understand the potential ramifications of Bhinder’s alleged breach, it is useful to review previous incidents involving electronic devices:

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was the Rajasthan Royals manager penalized?

The manager, Romi Bhinder, was filmed using a smartphone inside the dugout during a live IPL match, violating Article 12.4 of the anti‑corruption code, prompting the BCCI to issue a showcause notice and consider fines or suspensions.

What penalties can the manager face?

Potential sanctions include fines up to ₹5 crore, multi‑match bans, and possible suspension from future IPL duties, depending on the severity of the breach and the BCCI’s disciplinary review under the anti‑corruption regulations.

How did the incident affect IPL dugout policy?

The episode intensified calls for uniform dugout‑device restrictions across all franchises, prompting discussions of device‑free zones, real‑time monitoring, and clearer disciplinary guidelines to prevent similar violations and safeguard match integrity.

Which BCCI article addresses phone use?

The relevant provision is Article 12.4 of the IPL anti‑corruption code, which expressly prohibits the use of electronic devices by team officials within the playing area during a match.

Rajeshware

Rajeshware has followed cricket for more than fifteen years, from dawn Test sessions to the closing overs of T20 finals. The focus here is the tactical and structural side of the game: how teams build squads, why captains make the calls they do, and what domestic leagues outside India reveal about where cricket is heading. Rajeshware writes our analysis of the IPL, franchise economics, and cricket governance, with a preference for the story the scorecard leaves out. When a match turns, the aim is to explain the over that turned it, not just report the final result.

Year Individual Violation Penalty
2021 Kieron Pollard (Rajasthan Royals) Unauthorized use of a smartwatch during a match ₹1 crore fine, 1‑match suspension